Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Harris v. LOreal USA Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv05220
Plaintiff:
Catherine Harris
Defendant:
LOreal USA Inc., LOreal USA Products Inc., Soft Sheen Carson, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Baker et al v. Mallinckrodt LLC. et al
as 4:2020cv00569
Plaintiff:
Beverly Scholfield, Jacqueline Newton, Jessica Baker and others
Defendant:
MALLINCKRODT LLC., Cotter Corp. and Mallinckrodt LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harris v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC
as 4:2020cv10405
Plaintiff:
Mary Catherine Harris
Defendant:
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harris v. Saul
as 2:2019cv00463
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Catherine Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Harris v. City of Boston et al
as 1:2019cv11558
Defendant:
Tufts Medical Center, John Doe 2, D.O. Matthew Mostifi and others
Plaintiff:
Catherine Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harris v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
as 3:2018cv01908
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Catherine Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wolfe et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 1:2018cv01155
Plaintiff:
Georgeanna Hammerle, Robin Andrews, Brandon Long and others
Defendant:
UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation, Inc., The 3M Company, Buckeye Fire Equipment Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t - Diversity: Torts
Harris v. Progressive Direct Ins. Co.
as 16-6336
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CATHERINE HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY
Harris v. Progressive Northern Insurance Company
as 5:2015cv01252
Plaintiff:
Catherine Harris
Defendant:
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv02185
Plaintiff:
Catherine Harris and Paul Harris
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
