Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 113
Janet E Carpenter et al v. 3M Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv11797
Plaintiff: Brian H Carpenter, Tanya D Hardin, Teri D Carpenter and others
Defendant: Warren Pumps, LLC, Weir Valves & Controls USA, Inc., BP Amoco Chemical Company and others
Petitioner: Flowserve US Inc.
Consolidated Defendant: Spirax Sarco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Janet E. Carpenter et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2020cv11810
Plaintiff: Janet E. Carpenter, Tanya D. Hardin, Brian H. Carpenter and others
Defendant: Gardner Denver, Inc., Spirax Sarco, Inc., Carver Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ALLEN v. 3M COMPANY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01150
Defendant: FLUOR CONSTRUCTORS INTERNATIONAL, VIACOMCBS INC., 3M COMPANY and others
Plaintiff: JUDY A. ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dunbar v. ABB Motors and Mechanical Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv04069
Defendant: Howden North America Inc., Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. A Delaware Corporation doing business as Ingalls Shipbuilding formerly known as Northrop Grumman Ship Systems formerly known as Ingalls Shipbuilding, a division of Litton Systems, Inc., Velan Valve Corp. and others
Plaintiff: James Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
v. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 2:2020cv05656
Not Classified By Court: JEFF SCHLICHTING
Defendant: A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, WARREN PUMPS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HILSTER et al v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv01537
Defendant: CRANE INSTRUMENTATION & SAMPLING, INC., FLOWSERVE CORPORATION, SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SYSTEMS USA, INC. and others
Plaintiff: CHARLES W. HILSTER, JR. and SHIRLEY A. HILSTER
Counter Defendant: GRINNELL LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SMITH v. ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv00921
Defendant: JOY GLOBAL UNDERGROUND MINING, LLC, ITT CORPORATION, FLOWSERVE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff: SADIE B. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Amanda Hailey v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp
as 20-1980
3Rd Party Plaintiff: FOSTER WHEELER LLC
Defendant: METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, WARREN PUMPS, INCORPORATED, GREEN, TWEED & CO. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: AMANDA BROOKE HAILEY, Personal Representative of the Estate of Charles Anthony Shockley, TABITHA SIMMONS, To the Use of Tabitha Simmons, Surviving Daughter of Charles Anthony Shockley and ROBIN L. SHOCKLEY, Surviving Spouse of Charles Anthony Shockley
Defendant / Appellee: IMO INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, f/k/a Delaval, Inc., f/k/a DeLaval Turbine, Inc., f/k/a IMP Delaval, Inc., CRANE CO, (Individually and as Successor-in-Interest to Chapman Valve Co., Deming Pumps, Cochrane Corp., Cochrane, Inc., Crane Pumps, Jenkins Valves, National-US Radiator Corp., National Steel Boilers and Pacific Steel Boiler Co.), CBS CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation formerly known as Viacom, Inc., Successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation formerly known as Westinghouse Electric Corporation and B.F. Sturtevant and others
3Rd Party Defendant: MANVILLE TRUST PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST
WALLS et al v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00098
Plaintiff: Laura M. Walls and Robie W. Walls
Defendant: Strick Trailers LLC, Paccar Inc., METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Christopher Clarke et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv00591
Defendant: PENTAIR VALVES & CONTROLS, INC. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest 10 KEYSTONE VALVES & CONTROLS, INC.), Gardner Denver, Inc., J.T. Thorpe & Son, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Christopher Clarke and Clarke Cheryl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?