Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Kurtz v. Omaha Beef et al
as 8:2026cv00698
Defendant:
Vernon Chandler, Hogan and Omaha Beef
Plaintiff:
Joseph A Kurtz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jackson #951188 v. Chandler et al
as 2:2026cv00275
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Unknown Party #1, Unknown Shaw and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Jackson #951188, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Chandler, City of et al
as 2:2026cv10202
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Unknown Reed, Keshaun Maurice Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Danica Erika Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Kurtz v. Binder et al
as 8:2026cv00666
Defendant:
Vernon Chandler and Cherie Binder
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Kurtz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chandler-Patterson v. The Nemours Foundation
as 3:2026cv02996
Defendant:
The Nemours Foundation
Plaintiff:
Rachael Chandler-Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
USA v. Chandler Broderick
as 26-14014
Defendant:
CHANDLER BRODERICK
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Prasad v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2026cv07904
Plaintiff:
Mayank Gautam Prasad and Mayank Prasad
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Chandler, City of, Mark White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dukes v. Harouff et al
as 1:2026cv05155
Defendant:
Sgt Rosas, Lt D Hill, Sgt B Kevan and others
Plaintiff:
Zion Rashaun Dukes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jackson #951188 v. Donley et al
as 2:2026cv00266
Plaintiff:
Douglas Jackson #951188, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Donley, Unknown Gutierrez, Unknown Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Charles County, Maryland
as 8:2026cv04467
Plaintiff:
Annette L. Chandler
Defendant:
Charles County, Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Employment Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
