Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Campbell v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 6:2024cv01010
Plaintiff:
Nathan Charles Campbell, Jr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Campbell v. O'Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC
as 1:2023cv00619
Plaintiff:
CHARLES CAMPBELL
Defendant:
O'REILLY AUTO ENTERPRISES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Campbell v. Perkins et al
as 1:2023cv00478
Plaintiff:
Charles Campbell
Defendant:
Clifton T. Perkins, John Mbah, Kevin Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
THALHEIMER v. CAMPBELL et al
as 1:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
TREVIN THALHEIMER
Defendant:
CHARLES CAMPBELL, TOWN OF BROOKVILLE, TERRY MITCHUM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Darden v. Campbell et al
as 1:2022cv00793
Plaintiff:
Sharif Darden
Defendant:
Charles Campbell, C Allen and B Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Chappelle v. Campbell et al
as 1:2021cv00863
Plaintiff:
Vernon R. Chappelle, Sr.
Defendant:
Dr. Charles Campbell, Harold W. Clarke, Dara Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Conway
as 1:2020cv04960
Respondent:
Sheriff Butch Conway
Petitioner:
Kirk Charles Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Campbell v. Saul
as 5:2020cv03209
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Charles Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CAMPBELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv83138
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Knight v. Tate et al
as 2:2020cv02086
Defendant:
. Stuck, . Simmons, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
