Cases 1 - 10 of 10
FREEMAN v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2019cv04333
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA., MARK CAPOZZA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY
Petitioner:
CHARLES FREEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Freeman v. Davis et al
as 6:2017cv00546
Plaintiff:
Charles Freeman
Defendant:
Lorie Davis , Vance L Drum , Deborah G Cockrell and others
Amicu:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Freeman v. Terry Tibbal
as 13-4191
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES FREEMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
TERRY A. TIBBALS
Charles Christian v. Janet Willi
as 13-13265
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES FREEMAN CHRISTIAN, a.k.a. Charles Freeman
Defendant - Appellee:
JANET WILLIS
Freeman v. Tibbals
as 1:2012cv02557
Petitioner:
Charles Freeman
Respondent:
Terry A. Tibbals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ross v. Pawlicki
as 4:2011cv00393
Plaintiff:
William E Ross, III, Buster Keaton and Charles Freeman
Defendant:
J Pawlicki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02629
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Christian v. Houston County Jail et al
as 5:2009cv00351
Plaintiff:
Charles Freeman Christian
Defendant:
Houston County Jail, Charles Holt, Janet Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Morehouse Parish Detention Center et al
as 3:2009cv00652
Plaintiff:
Robert Charles Freeman
Defendant:
Morehouse Parish Detention Center and Jenni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Madison Parish Detention Center
as 5:2007cv01389
Plaintiff:
Charles Freeman
Defendant:
Warden Madison Parish Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
