Cases 1 - 10 of 13
HOWARD et al v. SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
HUMBERT HOWARD and CHERYL HOWARD
Defendant:
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Howard v. Union Security Insurance Company
as 0:2021cv02308
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Howard
Defendant:
Union Security Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
N.P. et al v. City University of New York et al
as 1:2020cv03059
Plaintiff:
Avery Toledo, N. P., Jack Jaskaran and others
Defendant:
City University of New York, Cheryl Howard and Rodney Pepe-Souvenir
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ward et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 3:2017cv03748
Defendant:
Monsanto Company , Osborn & Barr Communications, Inc. and Osborn & Barr Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sherlene Ward , James Abbott , Victor Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ward et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 4:2017cv01104
Defendant:
Monsanto Company , Osborn & Barr Communications, Inc. and Osborn & Barr Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sherlene Ward , James Abbott , Victor Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Howard v. City of Providence et al
as 1:2015cv00139
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Howard
Defendant:
City of Providence and Mario F. Cirillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Parker v. Howard et al
as 5:2013cv00145
Defendant:
Progressive County Mutual Insurance Co and Cheryl Howard
Plaintiff:
Latricia Morrison Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Howard v. United States of America
as 8:2012cv01176
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Howard
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Howard v. Keffer
as 4:2011cv00003
Petitioner:
Cheryl Howard
Respondent:
Joe Keffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ALBERGO et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2010cv06400
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH C. ALBERGO , GEORGIA ANDERSON , ALBERT J. BALAZ and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
