Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Klosterman v. Sedamsville Community Development Corp. et al
as 1:2020cv00119
Defendant:
Lonnie Wise, Patricia A. Burke, Mayor John Cranley and others
Plaintiff:
John Klosterman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheila Eyajan v. State of Ohio, et al
as 19-3716
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY RIPMA, Ashtabula Public Defender, FORENSIC PSYCHIATRIC CENTER OF NORTHEAST OHIO INC, KIM KOSKI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHEILA MARIE EYAJAN
DAVIS v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv02905
Defendant:
THE WASHINGTON POST NEWS PAPER, THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEDERAL CIRCUIT, ATTORNEY DAVID BARRISH and others
Plaintiff:
KIETH DAVIS and KEITH DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EYAJAN v. STATE OF OHIO et al
as 1:2019cv00161
Defendant:
KIM KOSKI, GERALD L. HEINBAUGH, MARY SPRINGER and others
Plaintiff:
SHEILA M. EYAJAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01500
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Olaniyan Adefumi v. Rebecca Prosper
as 19-1765
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OLANIYAN ADEFUMI
Defendant / Appellee:
REBECCA PROSPER, CITY SOLICITOR
Olaniyan Adefumi v. Rebecca Prosper
as 19-1766
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OLANIYAN ADEFUMI
Defendant / Appellee:
REBECCA PROSPER, CITY SOLICITOR
Powell v. Pittsfield, City of et al
as 3:2018cv30146
Defendant:
Pittsfield Police Department, Daniel Bianchi, Pittsfield Retirement Board and others
Plaintiff:
Walter J. Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jason Brown v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 17-2927
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON L. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Et Al, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA VOTER REGISTRATION and PHILADELPHIA LAW DEPARTMENT, (Assistant City Solicitor Jonathan Cooper)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
