Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Kalim Muhammad v. Wendy's of Bowling Green, Inc., et al
as 23-14126
Plaintiff:
KALIM A.R. MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
WENDY'S OF BOWLING GREEN, INC., COWIN KNOWLES, CIARA DENNIS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Muhammad et al v. Wendy's of Bowling Green, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Kalim A. R. Muhammad and Karima Lakssir Muhammad
Defendant:
Wendy's of Bowling Green, Inc., Cowin Knowles, Ciara Dennis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cowin v. Williamson County
as 1:2021cv00480
Defendant:
Williamson County
Plaintiff:
Gloria Cowin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morrell v. Sepulveda et al
as 4:2016cv00798
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Morrell
Defendant:
James Sepulveda, James C. Nelson, Richard Patsey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gray-Davis v. The State of New York et al
as 5:2014cv01490
Plaintiff:
LaFrancis Gray-Davis and Myrell Davis
Defendant:
The State of New York, Paul Rigby, Tammy Gronau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv07581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Watson v. Unknown Clerk 1, et al
as 11-2129
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE WATSON
Defendant - Appellee:
GILBERT NADEAU, ROBERT A. MULLIGAN, Chief Justice, MARGOT GARDNER BOTSFORD, Justice and others
Watson v. Owens, et al
as 11-2128
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE WATSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY OWENS, in his individual and official capacity, UNKNOWN CLERK, in her individual and official capacity, STEPHEN E. NEEL, Justice, in his individual and official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
