Cases 41 - 50 of 127
Moore v. Bishoff et al
as 3:2017cv08188
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Aaron Moore
Defendant:
Don Bishoff, Unknown Cox, Unknown Nava and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re Morning Song Bird Food Litigation
as 2:2017mc00046
Plaintiff:
Laura Cyphert , Milt Cyphert , Barbara Cowin and others
Defendant:
Scotts Miracle-Gro Company , The Scotts Company LLC and James Hagedorn
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
ODUMS v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION et al
as 1:2016cv05950
Plaintiff:
ELONZIO ODUMS
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION, GARY M. LANIGAN, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cowin et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06315
Plaintiff:
Sandra Cowin and Kenneth Cowin
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morrell v. Sepulveda et al
as 2:2016cv14232
Plaintiff:
Richard J Morrell
Defendant:
James Sepulveda, James C Nelson, Richard Patsey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Cowin-Gantz v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00619
Plaintiff:
Michelle R. Cowin-Gantz
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morrell v. Sepulveda et al
as 4:2016cv00798
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Morrell
Defendant:
James Sepulveda, James C. Nelson, Richard Patsey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Charles Cowin v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 16-20100
Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Appellant:
CHARLES COWIN, also known as Charles Phillip Cowin, also known as Charles P. Cowin
Charles Cowin v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 16-90001
Petitioner:
In re: CHARLES COWIN
Respondent:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Cowins, Courtney v. Boughton, Gary
as 3:2016cv00022
Petitioner:
Courtney M. Cowins
Respondent:
Gary Boughton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
