Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Massey v. Barker et al
as 1:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Quamaine Massey
Defendant:
Robert T. Barker, Curtis Tate, Peter Buchholte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Massey v. Hendley et al
as 1:2023cv00361
Plaintiff:
Quamaine Lee Massey and Quamaine Massey
Defendant:
FNU Hendley, Kizer Jr Morgon, FNU Stancil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manning v. Richardson et al
as 3:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Manning
Defendant:
Cindy LuAnn Richardson, Sandra Lowburg, Susan Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Manning v. Richardson et al
as 3:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Manning
Defendant:
Cindy LuAnn Richardson, Sandra Lowburg, Susan Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Manning v. Richardson et al
as 3:2022cv00305
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Manning
Defendant:
Cindy LuAnn Richardson, Sandra Lowburg, Susan Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Manning v. Richardson et al
as 3:2022cv00284
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Manning
Defendant:
Cindy LuAnn Richardson, Sandra Lowburg, Susan Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Manning v. Richardson et al
as 3:2022cv00259
Defendant:
McGregor, Cindy LuAnn Richardson, Sandra Lowburg and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Manning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Tate #145822 v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 1:2021cv00243
Petitioner:
Curtis Tate #145822 and Willie Perry Woods
Respondent:
Michigan Parole Board, US Marshals Service and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Deursla Barron v. Curtis Tate
as 20-2903
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Deursla Lashay Barron
Defendant / Appellee:
Curtis Tate, Assigns Public Defender
Barron v. Tate
as 3:2020cv00188
Plaintiff:
Deursla Lashay Barron
Defendant:
Curtis Tate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
