Cases 61 - 70 of 13,437
Kevin Snodgrass, Jr. v. Christopher Gilbert
as 24-6398
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SNODGRASS, JR.
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER GILBERT, REANNE KEGLEY, Counselor at ROSP, AMEE DUNCAN, Counselor at ROSP and others
Zimmerman v. Thomas et al
as 2:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ivan Zimmerman
Defendant:
Sheriff Bryan Thomas, Chaplain Richard Ashford, Chief FNU Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Michael Campbell v. Township of North Brunswick, et al
as 24-1447
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. CAMPBELL
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF NORTH BRUNSWICK, MAYOR FRANCIS MAC WOMACK, CHIEF JOSEPH BATTAGLIA and others
ISHMAN v. SLOCUMB et al
as 1:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY W. ISHMAN
Defendant:
OFFICER SLOCUMB, OFFICER JACKSON, CAPTAIN THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MIMS v. GRAY et al
as 2:2024cv01042
Plaintiff:
HAABIYL MIMS
Defendant:
VICE ADMIRAL CHRISTOPHER S. GRAY, CARLOS DEL TORO, CAPTAIN JOSEPH DARCY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Wintrode v. Captain Hughes, et al.
as 1:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Joshwa Aaron Wintrode
Defendant:
Captain Hughes, Sgt. Ron Owen, Deputy Rebecca Coffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sykes v. Watt et al
as 4:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
James Elwyn Sykes
Defendant:
Sheriff Tom Watt, FNU Starky, T. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cheng v. United States of America
as 24-1131
Plaintiff:
SHENG-WEN CHENG, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, C.O. ANDRE HICKSON, Warden JEAN RENE and others
El v. Chun
as 24-1142
Defendant:
BLAIR, JOSEPH FUCITO, Sergeant PETER LITRA, Shield #1197 and others
Plaintiff:
SAGE EL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
