Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Dotson v. Cowgill et al
as 3:2026cv00185
Plaintiff:
Carl Edward Dotson
Defendant:
Cowgill, T Hurst, P McNulty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Johnson
as 26-137
Petitioner:
In re: CARL EDWARD JOHNSON
Respondent:
DOUGLAS A. COLLINS, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Berryhill et al v. Detrex Corporation et al
as 3:2026cv00080
Plaintiff:
Joan Berryhill, Ella Mae Booker, Michael Booker and others
Defendant:
Detrex Corporation, Italmatch USA Corporation, WSP USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kitson Entertainment Group LLC v. The Estate of Carl Edward Thompson, SA Ashley Thompson et al
as 1:2026cv00982
Plaintiff:
Kitson Entertainment Group LLC
Defendant:
Emille Thompson, Myles Turnage, Quincey Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Windsor v. Turner
as 5:2026cv00014
Petitioner:
Carl Edwards Windsor, III
Respondent:
Kevin Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BELL v. SISSEM et al
as 1:2025cv00378
Plaintiff:
CARL EDWARD BELL
Defendant:
HOWARD SISSEM and LAUREL R. HARRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Carl Bell v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 25-3197
Plaintiff:
CARL EDWARD BELL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ERIE COUNTY
Duhamel v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 7:2025cv00474
Petitioner:
Carl Edward Duhamel
Respondent:
Eric Guerrero-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duhamel v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 7:2025cv00475
Petitioner:
Carl Edward Duhamel
Respondent:
Eric Guerrero-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duhamel v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2025cv00226
Petitioner:
Carl Edward Duhamel
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
