Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Harris v. Boyd et al
as 0:2018cv02890
Defendant:
Estate of Erin Elizabeth Boyd, Court of Appeals of the Prairie Island Mdewakanton Dakota Community and Tribal Court of the Prairie Island Mdewakanton Dakota Community
Plaintiff:
Carl Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Precise Boring of Ohio, LLC v. Kanawha Falls Public Service District et al
as 2:2018cv00783
Plaintiff:
Precise Boring of Ohio, LLC
Defendant:
Kanawha Falls Public Service District, Carl Harris, Jonathan Grose and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. USA
as 3:2018cv00134
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Carl Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00773
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harris, Jr. v. Jones, et al.
as 2:2017cv00081
Plaintiff:
Carl Harris, Jr.
Defendant:
Scott R. Jones and Sacramento County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. The House of The Foaming Case Inc.
as 1:2016cv01783
Plaintiff:
Carl Harris
Defendant:
The House of The Foaming Case Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Harris v. AbbVie Inc et al
as 1:2016cv00538
Plaintiff:
Carl Harris
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc, Abbott Laboratories, Unimed Pharmaceuticals, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Carl Harri
as 13-4840
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CARL HARRIS
The Royalty Network, Inc., et al v. Carl Harris, et al
as 13-12460
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THE ROYALTY NETWORK, INC., FRANK LIWALL and STEVEN WEBER
Defendant - Appellant:
CARL HARRIS, d.b.a. Phat Groov Music, PHAT GROOV MUSIC, PHAT GROOV MUSIC LLC and others
The Royalty Network, Inc., et al v. Carl Harris, et al
as 13-12460
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THE ROYALTY NETWORK, INC., FRANK LIWALL and STEVEN WEBER
Defendant / Appellant:
CARL HARRIS, d.b.a. Phat Groov Music, PHAT GROOV MUSIC, PHAT GROOV MUSIC LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
