Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Sapp v. Brundridge et al
as 1:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
Nicole Sapp
Defendant:
Dexter L. Brundridge, Superior Court of Richmond County, Dominion Management Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jim's Car Wash et al v. City of Dallas et al
as 3:2021cv01746
Plaintiff:
Jim's Car Wash, Freddy Davenport and Dale Davenport
Defendant:
City of Dallas, Chad West, Adam Medrano and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taylor v. County of Wayne et al
as 5:2016cv10466
Plaintiff:
Willie James Taylor
Defendant:
Wayne, County of , Benny N. Napoleon , John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Armstrong v. Tescher et al
as 2:2014cv00024
Plaintiff:
Muiria Armstrong
Defendant:
Jolyne Tescher, Rhonda Belgarde, Carolyn Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Lindsey v. Bedford Care Center of Mendenhall et al
as 3:2013cv00325
Plaintiff:
Sharon S. Lindsey
Defendant:
Bedford Care Center of Mendenhall and Carolyn Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
National Solid Waste Mgmt, et al v. City of Dallas, et al
as 12-10251
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NATIONAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, IESI TX CORPORATION, REPUBLIC WASTE SERVICES OF TEXAS LTD and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF DALLAS, MIKE RAWLINGS, PAULINE MEDRANO and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv04052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
