Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Banks v. Joy et al
as 5:2017ct03130
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
S. Joy, C/O McCray, Counselor Dillard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Grosse v. Central Intelligence Agency
as 3:2014cv01230
Plaintiff:
Marcus Lee Grosse
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Banks v. Ben, et al
as 13-4626
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS, AN AMERICAN INDIAN
Defendant - Appellee:
BEN, A U.S. PROBATION OFFICER CONCOCTING LIES OUT OF THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, CHIEF UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICER, UNITED STATES PROBATION DEPARTMENT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
BANKS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2013cv01615
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, BEN LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chadwick v. Cummings et al
as 1:2013cv00821
Plaintiff:
Claude Wayne Chadwick
Defendant:
Sam R. Cummings, Scott Frost, Sim Lake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frederick Banks v. Hillary Clinton, et al
as 12-2168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick Banks, An American Indian
Defendant - Appellee:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Kathleen Sebelius, Internal Revenue Service and others
Banks v. Clinton et al
as 4:2012cv00183
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Kathleen Sebelius, Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brunson v. Central Intelligent Agency et al
as 0:2011cv00439
Plaintiff:
Ronald Brunson
Defendant:
Central Intelligent Agency and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Louis Fasullo v. People of the United States o, et al
as 09-1067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS FASULLO
Defendant - Appellee:
PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
