Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Nelson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Chad Nelson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
US Attorney-Social Security Noticing and SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSDC)
Fagon v. Ratajczak
as 23-7987
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SHERENE FAGON, Administrator of the Estate of Zoe Dowdell
Defendant:
JAMES WARDWELL
Defendant / Appellant:
Detective CHRISTOPHER KIELY, Detective MARCIN RATAJCZAK, Officer MICHAEL SLAVIN and others
WETHERALD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv50721
Plaintiff:
CHAD NELSON WETHERALD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nelson v. James Hardie Building Products Inc.
as 1:2021cv01777
Plaintiff:
Chad Nelson
Defendant:
James Hardie Building Products Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NELSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv91503
Plaintiff:
CHAD NELSON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fagon v. Ratajczak et al
as 3:2018cv01594
Plaintiff:
Sherene Fagon
Defendant:
Chad Nelson, Marcin Ratajczak, Christopher Kiely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castro Gonzalez v. Nelson et al
as 3:2015cv01944
Plaintiff:
Albert Castro Gonzalez
Defendant:
Chad Nelson, Gustavo Barreto, Claudia E. Herzog and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Nelson v. Jesson et al
as 0:2013cv00340
Plaintiff:
Chad Nelson
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson , Minnesota Department of Human Services , State of Minnesota and others
Nelson v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2011cv02085
Plaintiff:
Chad Nelson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Nelson v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2011cv00273
Plaintiff:
Chad Nelson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
