Cases 21 - 30 of 80
Phillips et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv10727
Plaintiff:
Amy J. Phillips and Charles H. Phillips, Jr.
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YaVaughnie Wilkins et al v. Micro Productions LLC et al
as 2:2014cv05278
Plaintiff:
21 Yellow Tulips LLC and YaVaughnie Wilkins
Defendant:
Micro Productions LLC and Charles E. Phillips, Jr.
Waugh v. Dow
as 14-6135
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. WAUGH
Defendant - Appellant:
JUSTIN M. DOW, Deputy
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, MAJOR COUNTY, CHARLES A. PHILLIPS, Deputy and others
Campbell v. Phillips Seafood, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00049
Plaintiff:
Peter Campbell, III
Defendant:
Phillips Seafood, Inc. and Charles M. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Rendall v. Phillips et al
as 3:2014cv00562
Plaintiff:
Stephen J. Rendall
Defendant:
Charles G. Phillips and Silas Hill Ranch, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Divner v. Phillips Seafood, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00109
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Van Divner, Jr.
Defendant:
Phillips Seafood, Inc. and Charles M. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Phillips v. Colvin
as 2:2013cv00304
Plaintiff:
Charles E Phillips, Jr.
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Robert Freedman v. Sumner Redstone, et al
as 13-3372
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT FREEDMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
SUMNER M. REDSTONE, PHILIPPE P. DAUMAN, THOMAS E. DOOLEY and others
Phillips et al v. The Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 1:2013cv02372
Plaintiff:
Bridgette Phillips and Charles A. Phillips
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and OWRI Property Management
Phillips v. Pearson's Painting, Inc.
as 8:2013cv00211
Defendant:
Pearson's Painting, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Charles L. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
