Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Charles Dawson v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-12934
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES DAWSON
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Ginger Ameigh et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05048
Plaintiff:
Ginger Ameigh, Christi Baker, Robert Boepple and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Ameigh et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00839
Plaintiff:
Ginger Ameigh, Christi Baker, Robert Boepple and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Ameigh et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00839
Plaintiff:
Ameigh, Ginger Ameigh, Christi Baker and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Dawson v. TransUnion LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00034
Plaintiff:
Charles Dawson
Defendant:
TransUnion LLC and Douglas J. Brooks
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Overland v. Synergies3 TEC Services, LLC
as 4:2021cv01008
Plaintiff:
Talon Overland, Daniel Murphy, Mike Baker and others
Defendant:
Synergies3 TEC Services, LLC, Benton Odom and Eric Atchley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Aron et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2020cv09376
Plaintiff:
Theresa Roberts, Janet Dawson, Stephen Morris and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran and Lynn A. Faulkner
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Francis Smith v. Charles Osborne, et al
as 20-40684
Defendant / Appellee:
Atticus Cox, Scott Mays, Michael Kersten and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Francis Amodu Smith
Dawson v. One Call Medical, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv01188
Defendant:
One Call Medical, Inc., Rone Baldwin, Align Networks and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Dawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAWSON v. WARDEN
as 2:2019cv00620
Respondent:
WARDEN
Petitioner:
CHARLES DAWSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
