Cases 1 - 10 of 22
PATTERSON v. FORSTEAL et al
as 1:2023cv02095
Plaintiff:
RODERICK STANDELL PATTERSON
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORSTEAL, MARION COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, ALLYSON HUMPHREY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOSS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv08803
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MOSS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moss v. Jones
as 1:2022cv00818
Petitioner:
Charles Moss
Respondent:
D. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hill v. Cox et al
as 3:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Parris Marshay Hill
Defendant:
Brent Cox, Robert Case, Alicia Houble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Rowland et al
as 3:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
Parris Marshay Hill
Defendant:
Falicia Rowland, Robert Case, Brent Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Greene County et al
as 3:2021cv00165
Plaintiff:
Parris Hill
Defendant:
Greene County, Greene County Detention Center, Morgan Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOSS et al v. MYLAN LABORATORIES LTD. et al
as 1:2020cv16512
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., RITE AID CORP., MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and others
In Re:
VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MOSS and KATHERINE JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Charles Mo
as 16-30284
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES MOSS
Jameka Evans v. Georgia Regional Hospital, et al
as 15-15234
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMEKA K. EVANS
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGIA REGIONAL HOSPITAL, CHARLES MOSS, LISA CLARK and others
Evans v. Georgia Regional Hospital et al
as 4:2015cv00103
Plaintiff:
Jameke K. Evans
Defendant:
Georgia Regional Hospital, Charles Moss, Lisa Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
