Cases 1 - 10 of 742
Howard v. City of Savannah et al
as 4:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Michael Antonio Howard
Defendant:
City of Savannah, State of Georgia, Judge Lousie Abbot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHATHAM COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION v. META PLATFORMS, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
CHATHAM COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION
Defendant:
META PLATFORMS, INC., FACEBOOK PAYMENTS, INC., SICULUS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
CHATHAM v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
CARRIE ANN CHATHAM
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Barber v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Terry Lynn Barber
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Tate Reeves, Lynn Fitch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Levy v. Hagood et al
as 4:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Charles Christian Levy
Defendant:
A. Hagood and Department of Community Supervision of Chatham County, GA (State)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Navarro et al v. Walmart, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Grace Navarro and Chatham Mullins
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00950
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Reynolds v. Minter et al
as 4:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Terry Darnell Reynolds
Defendant:
Roy Mintor, Savannah Chatham Metro Police Department, Vincent Pelligrini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
