Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Nelson v. IDOC et al
as 3:2024cv01897
Defendant:
IDOC, Sgt Benard and Shawnee Correctional Center
Plaintiff:
Christopher Eric Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. IDOC et al
as 3:2024cv01898
Defendant:
Shawnee Correctional Center, IDOC and John/Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Christopher Eric Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Nelson
as 23-50449
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Christopher Dallas Nelson
NELSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08910
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RYAN NELSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WAGNER v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv07508
Plaintiff:
JAMES WAGNER, JOHNATHAN WAGNER, BOYD A. WALKER, JR. and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wagner et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00678
Plaintiff:
James Wagner, Johnathan Wagner, Boyd A. Walker, Jr. and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Nelson v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv02193
Petitioner:
Christopher Len Nelson
Respondent:
David Shinn, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Acting Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson v. Fikes
as 2:2022cv00090
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Nelson
Respondent:
Warden Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nelson v. California Employment Development Department et al
as 3:2021cv02145
Plaintiff:
Christopher T. Nelson
Defendant:
California Employment Developement Department and Rita Saenz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 va Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 14th Amendment
Bridgeforth Logistics, LLC v. Nelson
as 1:2021cv00607
Plaintiff:
Bridgeforth Logistics, LLC
Defendant:
Christopher Daryl Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.