Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Edd Christopher Rogers v. State of California et al
as 2:2011cv06506
Defendant:
Bernal, California Dept of Adult Parole Operations, California Dept of Corrections and Rehabilitations and others
Plaintiff:
Edd Christopher Rogers
Christopher Rogers v. Phillip Kern
as 11-3152
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER ROGERS
Respondent - Appellee:
PHILLIP KERNS, Warden
US v. Christopher Roger
as 11-4024
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER ROGERS
Peoples Benefit Life Insurance Company v. Rogers et al
as 4:2010cv04485
Plaintiff:
Peoples Benefit Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Christopher Rogers, Shaun Rogers, Douglas Rogers and others
Cross_claimant:
The Estate of Frank Tucker
Cross_defendant:
Douglas Rogers
Counter_claimant:
The Estate of Frank Tucker
Counter_defendant:
Douglas Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv03674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Rodgers v. Kerns
as 2:2009cv00243
Petitioner:
Christopher Rogers
Respondent:
Phillip Kerns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Skyward Construction Inc. v. Rogers et al
as 3:2009cv00211
Plaintiff:
Skyward Construction Inc.
Defendant:
Christopher Rogers and Rogers Consulting and Construction Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
US v. Christopher Rogers
as 08-5052
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER ROGERS
Friedman v. United States Postal Svc et al
as 3:2008cv00913
Plaintiff:
Jess Friedman
Defendant:
United States Postal Svc and Christopher Rogers
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Shorthill et al v. Conley et al
as 3:2007cv00193
Plaintiff:
Carry Eugene Shorthill and Tina Rae
Defendant:
James M. Conley, Christopher Roger Nelson, Richard Dykstra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
