Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Meyers v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2018cv00002
Plaintiff:
Richard Paul Meyers
Defendant:
Ramirez, Wessels, Overguard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cockrum v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv15104
Plaintiff:
Annette Cockrum
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc. and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02781
Team Lead:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
COCKRUM et al v. DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv01370
Plaintiff:
ROY COCKRUM , SCOTT COMER and ERIC SCHOENBERG
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC. and ROGER STONE
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
SYLVESTER & COCKRUM, INC. v. R.W. WARNER, INC.
as 1:2017cv00535
Plaintiff:
SYLVESTER & COCKRUM, INC.
Defendant:
R.W. WARNER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
K.M.A. et al v. Santa Cruz et al
as 5:2017cv02090
Defendant:
City of Santa Cruz, Kevin Vogel, Bill Clayton and others
Plaintiff:
K.M.A. , Dacia Marler , Jeffrey Arlt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cockrum v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01531
Plaintiff:
Carroll Cockrum
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cockrum v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC et al
as 2:2016cv17830
Plaintiff:
Sharon Cockrum
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cockrum, III v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv10362
Plaintiff:
Isaac Cockrum, III
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cockrum v. Colvin
as 6:2015cv03458
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Ricky Cockrum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
