Cases 31 - 40 of 147
Colon v. Randolph-Macon Academy et al
as 5:2019cv00082
Defendant:
Randolph-Macon Academy Board of Trustees, David C. Wesley and Randolph-Macon Academy
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Colon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Centraarchy Restaurant Mgmt v. Philip Angelo
as 19-1888
Defendant / Appellant:
MARK ODEGARD, DERRICK BELTON, PATRICK THOMPSON and others
Defendant:
JEREMY DOUGLAS NIELSEN, CHELSEA MCCAFFREY COOK, DANIELLE DOWSEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CENTRAARCHY RESTAURANT MANAGEMENT COMPANY
Bey v. Colon et al
as 2:2019cv00941
Defendant:
Jennifer McCoy, Nina L Savas, Jobany Colon and others
Plaintiff:
Dreyah Boorae Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gibson et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2018cv03416
Plaintiff:
Berniece Robinson, Samuel James, Jr., Jacqueline Middleton and others
Defendant:
Kidde-Fenwal, Inc., National Foam Inc, Tyco Fire Products LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VELEZ v. COLON
as 1:2018cv00917
Plaintiff:
GRACIANO VELEZ
Defendant:
ESTHER REBECA LUZON COLON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Colon v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00752
Plaintiff:
Emiliana Colon
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vanderhoff-Colon v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00707
Plaintiff:
Georgia Vanderhoff-Colon
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Colon v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2018cv01080
Plaintiff:
Wilmer Colon
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Colon v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston, The
as 6:2018cv00684
Plaintiff:
Jose Colon
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
HAMBLEN v. FRYE et al
as 1:2018cv00177
Plaintiff:
DONNA HAMBLEN
Defendant:
SUSAN FRYE, LAURA ALLISON SMITH, THERESSA PHIPPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
