Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Conroy v. U S Bank Trust Co N A et al
as 6:2026cv03581
Defendant: Nationstar Mortgage L L C doing business as Mr Cooper Group Inc doing business as Rushmore Servicing formerly known as Rushmore Loan Management L L C, U S Bank Trust Co N A and Rushmore Loan Management L L C
Plaintiff: Wes Mitchell Conroy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Conroy #131179 v. Beltran
as 4:2026cv00471
Plaintiff: Raymond Conroy
Defendant: T Beltran and Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00474
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01858
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2026cv03095
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
USA v. Conroy
as 26-10784
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: John Alan Conroy
Conroy et al v. McCosker et al
as 3:2026cv01771
Plaintiff: Gordon Conroy and Broken Horn Outfitters
Defendant: Patrick McCosker and State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rivers v. Dollard et al
as 1:2026cv07189
Plaintiff: Jayden Rivers
Defendant: Mary Dollard, James House, Olisameka Akamnanu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conroy v. Mohan et al
as 1:2026cv01440
Plaintiff: Glenn E Conroy, Jr
Defendant: Dr Mohan and Bonnie M Nowakowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conroy v. Bird
as 3:2026cv05907
Plaintiff: Shaun Conroy
Defendant: Dr Pamela Bird
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?