Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Christopher Smith v. Robert Wilson
as 23-7140
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER DEKOTA SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT WILSON, OFFICER CORBET and OFFICER BEADY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Sheriff Dart et al
as 1:2023cv15545
Plaintiff:
Steve Mitchell
Defendant:
Sheriff Dart, Officer Brown, Officer Corbet and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
CORBET et al v. DIAMOND AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 1:2022cv02457
Plaintiff:
TODD CORBET, HELENA CORBET and BENJAMIN CORBET
Defendant:
DIAMOND AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Smith v. Wilson et al
as 5:2022ct03410
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dekota Smith
Defendant:
Sgt. Robert Wilson, Officer Corbet and Officer Beady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KINCHEL v. CAULFIELD et al
as 2:2022cv05242
Plaintiff:
MAURICE ANTHONY KINCHEL
Defendant:
JUDGE REGINA CAUFIELD, WILLIAM A. DANIEL, LISA GREY-STACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oliphant v. Taylor et al
as 9:2022cv00066
Defendant:
John Doe, Chad Taylor, Anitra Lindley and others
Plaintiff:
Terrence Lavail Oliphant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Corbet v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2022cv06049
Plaintiff:
Joyce M Corbet
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Corbet v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC
as 3:2021cv02266
Plaintiff:
James Corbet
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC and Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Virgo Virgillio v. Sally Riddicks, et al
as 20-3641
Defendant / Appellee:
SALLY RIDDICKS and THOMAS CORBETS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VIRGO VIRGILLIO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
