Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Usry et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv04636
Plaintiff:
Theresa A Usry, Shawn Hurst, Lisa Murray and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Sutton (Simpson)
as 26-1295
Defendant:
DARRIUS SUTTON, TRAVA SELBY, TYSHAWN SUMPTER and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
GREENE v. CITY OF GREENSBORO, et al
as 3:2026cv00050
Plaintiff:
DIANNE GREENE
Defendant:
CITY OF GREENSBORO, COREY WILLIAMS, MARK SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv11644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Hadrich v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv00930
Plaintiff:
Corey William Hadrich
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of Social Security Decision (SSID)
Williams v. Brown et al
as 3:2026cv00196
Plaintiff:
Corey Williams
Defendant:
Jeremiah Brown, Jane Doe, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wetherington et al v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2025cv11503
Plaintiff:
Randy Wetherington, Amber Whatley, Alejandro Wheaton and others
Defendant:
3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2025cv02031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Williams v. Pella Windows and Doors, Inc.
as 1:2025cv00962
Plaintiff:
Corey Williams
Defendant:
Pella Windows and Doors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
