Cases 1 - 10 of 344
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2025cv02514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv01787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
United States of America v. Correia
as 25-1144
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
AARON MICHAEL CORREIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv01406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
US v. Shafa
as 25-1146
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
RAHIM SHAFA
Interested Party:
ZACHARY GORMAN, MATTHEW SULLIVAN, JOSEPH PARDINI and others
Bradby et al v. Koetting et al
as 3:2025cv00026
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Bradby, Kimberly Webb, Raymond DiGiorgio and others
Defendant:
Dan Koetting, Jairo Perez, GDA Consulting Group, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Correia v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2025cv00100
Plaintiff:
Lorna Correia
Defendant:
Arizant Healthcare, Inc. and 3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Brown v. Kanelopoulos et al
as 1:2025cv00012
Defendant:
Casey Correia, Sean Lafferty, City of Providence and others
Plaintiff:
Janet Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Antar v. Grogins
as 24-3245
Plaintiff:
THEODORA F. ANTAR, Individually and as next friend and legal guardian of her minor children A.L. and J.V.
Defendant:
ROBERT KOCHISS, individually and officially, Officer V. SENATORE, individually and officially, Honorable Judge, SCOTT JONES, individually and officially and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03105
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
