Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Taylor v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv11145
Plaintiff:
Cori Taylor
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Producrtion SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Taylor v. Martin et al
as 2:2022cv02403
Plaintiff:
Corry Taylor and Cory Taylor
Defendant:
Officer Martin, Shelby County, Officer Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv01010
Plaintiff:
Cori Taylor
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cory Taylor v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 2:2021cv08810
Plaintiff:
Cory Taylor
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
TAYLOR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv37123
Plaintiff:
CORY TAYLOR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. City of Nelsonville Ohio et al
as 2:2021cv03898
Plaintiff:
Gregory Smith
Defendant:
City of Nelsonville Ohio, Tony Dunfee, Elizabeth Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv34289
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CORY TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parker et al v. Clark et al
as 0:2018cv01809
Defendant:
Cole Peterson, Blayne Lehner, City of Minneapolis, the and others
Plaintiff:
Regina Coleman, Ksean Ewing, Chiquita Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gerardo Gonzales v. Bill Rutledge, et al
as 17-17553
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERARDO GONZALES
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL RUTLEDGE, Retired Sheriff's Deputy, Kern County, CORY TAYLOR, Retired Human Services, W. S. WAHL and others
Gonzales v. Rutledge et al
as 1:2017cv00387
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Gonzales
Defendant:
Bill Rutledge, Cory Taylor, W.S. Wahl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
