Cases 1 - 10 of 346
MARSHALL v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00728
Plaintiff:
SHAWN MARSHALL A.K.A. DEEZ NUTZ
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC, KELCY PENNINGTON and COUCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Brannon et al
as 6:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
David Washington
Defendant:
CO Erik Brannon, CO Sylvanus Umebali, CO Christopher Couch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. ARMSTRONG et al
as 1:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
STACY SMITH
Defendant:
LISA ARMSTRONG, OFFICER COUCH, MEGAN OLSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Couch v. Akers
as 3:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Alastair Couch
Defendant:
Daniel Akers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elliott v. Grace
as 1:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Jamie Elliott
Defendant:
Lt. Grace, Sgt. Weavering, C.O.I. Harmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Couch et al
as 2:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Irvin Lamar Simpson
Defendant:
Gerald Couch, Scott Cheeks, Bobby Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COUCH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 6:2023cv06100
Plaintiff:
JOE DEE COUCH
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Rios v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Kelly S. Rowe, Gregory Rushin, Dan Corvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALLACE v. IRWIN et al
as 3:2023cv00269
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WALLACE
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDANT RANDY IRWIN, DEPUTY J. BLICHA, LT. S. KOPCHICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
