Cases 41 - 50 of 191
Pendergraff v. Craighead County Court System et al
as 3:2019cv00343
Defendant:
Craighead County Court System, Sharp County Court, Clay County Court and others
Plaintiff:
William Edward Pendergraff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sons v. Craighead County Detention Center et al
as 3:2019cv00341
Defendant:
Doe, Craighead County Detention Center and Anthony Carter
Plaintiff:
Gregory Michael Sons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harold Sims v. Marty Boyde, et al
as 19-3406
Defendant / Appellee:
M. Ballard, Corporal, Craighead County Detention Center, Chadwick, Lieutenant, Craighead County Detention Center, Keith Bowers, Head Jailer, Craighead County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Harold Shawgnessy Sims
Marc Lockhart v. Keith Bowers
as 19-3242
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marc Lockhart
Defendant / Appellee:
Keith Bowers, Administrator, Captain, Craighead County Detention Center
Gary Webster v. M. Miles
as 19-2687
Defendant / Appellee:
M. Brian Miles, Managing Public Defender, Craighead County
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gary Leon Webster
Gary Webster v. Doe
as 19-2570
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gary Leon Webster
Defendant / Appellee:
Doe, Unknown Female Bookkeeper, Craighead County Detention Facility
Gary Webster v. Richard Rhodes
as 19-2565
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gary Leon Webster
Defendant / Appellee:
Richard F. Rhodes, Public Defender, Craighead County
Gary Webster v. Pamela Honeycutt
as 19-2237
Defendant / Appellee:
Pamela Honeycutt, Circuit Court Judge, Craighead County
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gary Leon Webster
Nooner v. Arkansas et al
as 4:2019cv00389
Defendant:
Bill Webster, Cavaneal, Wright and others
Plaintiff:
Terrick Nooner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nooner v. State Of Texas et al
as 6:2019cv00252
Defendant:
Judge FNU Harris, Judge FNU Schewski, Judge FNU Ray and others
Plaintiff:
Terrick Nooner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
