Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Crayton v. Boston Housing Authority, et al
as 26-2044
Plaintiff:
COREY CRAYTON
Defendant:
BOSTON HOUSING AUTHORITY, ERNESTO SALVIN, Custodian, SHERRI ADAMS, Manager and others
Evan Crayton v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2026cv10312
Plaintiff:
Evan Crayton
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Crayton v. Phillips et al
as 1:2026cv00227
Plaintiff:
William Charles Crayton
Defendant:
Warden Shawn Phillips, Warden Stacy Oakes, Henry Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crayton v. Alvarez et al
as 1:2026cv07854
Petitioner:
Keimon Crayton
Respondent:
Lt. Alvarez, John Doe and Village of Lansing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crayton v. Alvarez et al
as 2:2026cv02198
Plaintiff:
Keimon Crayton
Defendant:
Alvarez, John Doe and Village of Lansing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crayton v. Motorola Solutions, Inc et al
as 1:2026cv06223
Plaintiff:
Keimon Crayton
Defendant:
Motorola Solutions, Inc, Vigilant LLC, Evolv Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Crayton v. Bustos et al
as 1:2026cv06227
Plaintiff:
Keimon Crayton
Defendant:
Bustos, IC Solutions, Keefe Commisarry Network and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Crayton et al v. Mueller et al
as 1:2026cv06230
Plaintiff:
Keimon Crayton, Aniya Crayton and Akeem Crayton
Defendant:
Heidi Mueller, William Lind, People of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv05132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00481
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
