Cases 1 - 10 of 425
BROOKS v. TOBY et al
as 5:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
STANLEY BROOKS
Defendant:
WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY, DEPUTY WARDEN JEREMY FOTSON, DEPUTY WARDEN CALPURNIA WASHINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crayton v. People of Illinois
as 1:2024cv01153
Petitioner:
Keimon Crayton
Respondent:
People of Illinois
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Crayton v. Pritzer et al
as 1:2024cv01142
Plaintiff:
Keimon Crayton
Defendant:
J B Pritzer, U.S. and Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crayton v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01077
Plaintiff:
Keimon Crayton
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc., Bob, Ally and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crayton v. USA
as 1:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
Demonte Crayton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Crayton v. Family Dollar Stores of Texas, LLC
as 3:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Joaquin L Crayton
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores of Texas, LLC and Family Dollar Stores of Texas LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gayle v. Benton Harbor Area Schools et al
as 1:2023cv01340
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Gayle
Defendant:
Benton Harbor Area Schools, Benton Harbor Area Schools Board of Education, Kelvin Butts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Crayton v. USA
as 3:2023cv00252
Petitioner:
Alieu T. Crayton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Crayton v. QCHC
as 5:2023cv01598
Plaintiff:
Christopher Carnell Crayton
Defendant:
QCHC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
