Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Robinson v. Atkins et al
as 4:2016cv00548
Plaintiff:
Christopher Robinson
Defendant:
A Atkins, Scott Thomasee, D Armant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Lockhart et al
as 2:2013cv00131
Plaintiff:
Delwrick D Coleman
Defendant:
D Lockhart and Eldridge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deverick Scott v. Ray Hobbs, et al
as 13-1908
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Deverick Scott
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Larry May, Assistant Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Raymond Naylor, Disciplinary Hearing Administrator, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Scott v. Hobbs et al
as 2:2012cv00190
Plaintiff:
Deverick Scott
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Larry May, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Treppel v. Reason, et al
as 2:2011cv00384
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Treppel
Defendant:
J. Paul Reason , David R. Goode , Michael D. Lockhart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lockhart v. The Municipality of Anchorage et al
as 3:2010cv00283
Plaintiff:
Jimmie D. Lockhart, Sr.
Defendant:
The Municipality of Anchorage, Justin Shoffner and Attorneys James H. McCullum LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TREPPEL v. REASON et al
as 1:2010cv01641
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE TREPPEL
Defendant:
J. PAUL REASON, CHARLES W. WOORMAN, IV, DAVID R. GOODE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SunTrust Bank v. Lockhart et al
as 8:2010cv01343
Plaintiff:
SunTrust Bank
Defendant:
Andrew D. Lockhart and Lynn K. Lockhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOCKHART v. DUKE ENERGY INDIANA, INC. et al
as 3:2009cv00100
Plaintiff:
RONALD D. LOCKHART
Defendant:
DUKE ENERGY INDIANA, INC. and SUBSURFACE CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
