Cases 1 - 10 of 636
(PC) McCaa v. FCI-Herlong et al
as 2:2024cv01191
Plaintiff:
Cedriguez McCaa
Defendant:
FCI-Herlong, S. Salmonson, Haggard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ESTATE OF OLA D MOORE et al v. LLT MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 3:2024cv05344
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and others
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF OLA D MOORE and KAREN KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moslow et al v. City Of Southaven, Mississippi et al
as 3:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
David Warran Moslow, Jr. and Suzanne Moslow
Defendant:
City Of Southaven, Mississippi, Southaven Police Department, Former Police Chief Macon Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury Venue
Darrin LaPine v. D. Moore, et al
as 24-1146
Plaintiff:
DARRIN LAPINE
Defendant:
D. MOORE, Lieutenant, SERGEANT GOULD, STEPHANIE GORDON, Supervisor and others
MOORE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. MOORE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
MOORE v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES et al
as 5:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
VIVIAN D MOORE
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, APALACHEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities Act
(PC) Romero Diaz v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2023cv01758
Plaintiff:
Oscar Romero Diaz
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Pleasant Valley State Prison, PVSP Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Santerilli et al
as 1:2023cv16303
Plaintiff:
Ce'Andre D Moore
Defendant:
Dale Santerilli, l Young Kim, City Of Joliet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
