Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Coats v. Duckworth et al
as 3:2026cv05838
Plaintiff:
Marshall Allen Coats
Defendant:
Steve Duckworth, J Phipps, William Houser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-4691
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-4600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Phipps v. Carient Heart & Vascular, LLC
as 1:2026cv02149
Plaintiff:
Michael Phipps
Defendant:
Carient Heart & Vascular, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Bradley, Brandon v. Rymarkiewicz, Robert et al
as 3:2026cv00614
Plaintiff:
Brandon D. Bradley, Sr.
Defendant:
Robert Rymarkiewicz, Sgt. Phipps, Sgt. Nguyen and others
Unknown:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phipps v. LOreal USA, Inc., et al
as 1:2026cv07838
Plaintiff:
Linda Phipps
Defendant:
LOreal USA, Inc.,, LOreal USA Products Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC, and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chan v. Phipps et al
as 1:2026cv05083
Defendant:
CT Phipps, Charles T. Phipps, Michael Suttkus and others
Plaintiff:
Lap-Sun Chan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Meyers v. Almarale et al
as 7:2026cv00474
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
J. Almarale, N. Halcomb, J. Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHIPPS v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv04076
Plaintiff:
JESSICA PHIPPS
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harrison v. Crews et al
as 3:2026cv00045
Plaintiff:
James Harrison
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, Jane/John Does, Kentucky Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
