Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Franklin v. Racine County et al
as 2:2026cv01275
Plaintiff:
Tony C Franklin
Defendant:
Racine County, Nurse Arline, CO Villagranna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02502
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00254
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Arline v. Parks et al
as 3:2026cv00241
Plaintiff:
Leonard H. Arline
Defendant:
James Parks and Donna Shiflett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Socha v. Bisignano
as 1:2026cv00109
Plaintiff:
Arlin Socha
Defendant:
Frank J. Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001 et al
as 1:2026mc00731
Plaintiff:
Alice Hoglan, Estate of Siew Nya Ang, Estate of Mark Kendall Bingham and others
Unknown:
In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran et al
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00419
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00275
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00978
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Dean Jones v. Walmart, Inc.
as 2:2026cv00224
Plaintiff:
Kaenna Arline Dean Jones
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
