Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Cole v. Benteler Automotive Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00835
Plaintiff:
Richmond D. Cole
Defendant:
Benteler Automotive Corporation and Chuck Sandee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Cole v. Benteler Automotive Corporation et al
as 5:2023cv11698
Plaintiff:
Richmond D. Cole
Defendant:
Benteler Automotive Corporation and Chuck Sandee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Poole v. Estate of Craig Figley et al
as 2:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Joseph Poole
Defendant:
Estate of Craig Figley, Katherine E Kipp, Craig Figley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Gray et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv06610
Plaintiff:
Adam Gray, Jason Donnelly, Diana Zeyneb Alhindawi and others
Defendant:
City of New York, Sergeant William E. Balunas, Officer Sean P. Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1932 bv
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Forsythe v. City of Watertown et al
as 5:2017cv01132
Plaintiff:
Chad Forsythe
Defendant:
City of Watertown, Charles Donoghue, Cristin N. Fuhrman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2017
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2013
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00749
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
