Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Etheridge v. United States of America
as 5:2016cv00712
Movant:
Leonard D Etheridge
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1461
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Etheridge et al v. Blackwelder et al
as 4:2013cv00068
Plaintiff:
Kevin D. Etheridge and Christopher M. Moore
Defendant:
Robert Rowe, Murry Blackwelder and Chris Thornton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Etheridge v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2013cv00904
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D Etheridge
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Etheridge et al v. Blackwelder et al
as 3:2013cv00741
Plaintiff:
Kevin D. Etheridge, Jeremy N. Kirkland, Christopher M. Moore and others
Defendant:
Robert Rowe, Murry Blackwelder and Chris Thornton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Etheridge et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2012cv02561
Plaintiff:
Charlotte D. Etheridge and William Etheridge
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1413
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Noe v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2007cv00499
Plaintiff:
Woodburck Noe
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Richard F. Allen, Ms. Sparks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Coffey et al
as 7:2007cv00060
Plaintiff:
Michael S Adams
Defendant:
M. Terry Coffey, Jeff D. Etheridge, Jr., Charles D. Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
