Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Roundtree v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2026cv01990
Petitioner:
Terrence A Roundtree
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roundtree v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2026cv00194
Petitioner:
Terrence A Roundtree
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Monique Desormeaux v. Richmond County Sheriff's Office, et al
as 26-11715
Plaintiff:
MONIQUE DESORMEAUX
Defendant:
RICHMOND COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, RICHARD ROUNDTREE, KIMBERLY FONTENOT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv03031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bowden Roundtree v. City of New York et al
as 1:2026cv02724
Plaintiff:
Edward Bowden Roundtree
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer Johnny Marquez and NYPD Detective John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wheeler v. Richmond County, Georgia et al
as 1:2026cv00076
Plaintiff:
Richard Darnell Wheeler, Jr.
Defendant:
Richmond County, Georgia, Sheriff Richard Roundtree, Deputy Terence Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roundtree v. Bisignano
as 1:2026cv00853
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Plaintiff:
Jeannette Roundtree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Davis v. Roundtree
as 26-30171
Plaintiff:
Troy Davis
Defendant:
Jonathan A. Roundtree, Kenneth Norris and Unknown Collins, Doctor
ROUNDTREE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2026cv01981
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL ROUNDTREE
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CHEN and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roundtree v. Foss et al
as 5:2026ct03077
Plaintiff:
William G. Roundtree
Defendant:
Stephen Foss, Leslie Cooley Dismukes, Adrina G. Bass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.