Cases 11 - 20 of 930
Davis v. Lowe, et al
as 4:2023cv01896
Petitioner:
Damion Davis
Defendant:
Craig Lowe, Corrections Lieutenant Fagan, Linda Forshay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker #593090 v. Mieko et al
as 2:2023cv00213
Plaintiff:
Bruce Parker #593090
Defendant:
Stephen Mieko, Catherine Bauman, Doug Tasson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Lincoln et al
as 2:2023cv12508
Plaintiff:
Jhal D. Smith
Defendant:
Sarah Lincoln and Angelique Camfield-Kniper
Smith v. Erie County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2023cv01045
Plaintiff:
Hugh D. Smith
Defendant:
Erie County Sheriff's Department, R. Kuhn, Aaron M. Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2023cv20593
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. SMITH
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Eischen
as 0:2023cv02866
Petitioner:
Darrell D. Smith
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
(PC) Chambers v. Covello et al
as 2:2023cv02025
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chambers
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, L. Batson, D. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McBroom v. TransUnion Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv03270
Plaintiff:
Benjamin McBroom
Defendant:
Transunion Corporation, Latoya Hughes, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLORENCE v. COUNTRYMAN et al
as 4:2023cv00146
Petitioner:
KIM CAMILLE FLORENCE
Respondent:
Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY STACEY JACKSON, CALVIN PARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
John Smith v. Donnie Ames
as 23-6786
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN D. SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
DONNIE AMES, Superintendent
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
