Cases 1 - 10 of 974
Hill v. State of Montana et al
as 9:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Christopher Thomas Hill
Defendant:
State of Montana, Montana State Prison, James Salmonsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
El v. Chun
as 24-1142
Defendant:
BLAIR, JOSEPH FUCITO, Sergeant PETER LITRA, Shield #1197 and others
Plaintiff:
SAGE EL
Semidey v. D.O.C. Commissioner
as 3:2024cv00754
Plaintiff:
Samuel Semidey
Defendant:
D.O.C. Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moultrie v. Red Onion State Prison
as 7:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Jules Moultrie
Defendant:
Red Onion State Prison and D.O.C./Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. D.O.C.
as 3:2024cv00663
Plaintiff:
Charles Wilson
Defendant:
D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Branch v. Guadarrama et al
as 3:2024cv00536
Plaintiff:
Samuel Branch
Defendant:
Guadarrama and D.O.C. Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Virginia D.O.C. et al
as 7:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Dexter Wells
Defendant:
Virginia D.O.C. and Mississippi D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huntley v. Piccirillo et al
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Douglas J. Huntley
Defendant:
Nurse David Piccirillo, DOC Medical Director, D.O.C Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ezell v. Cole, et al
as 24-6025
Plaintiff:
JAMES RICKY EZELL, III
Defendant:
DAVID COLE, Warden GEO, L.C.F., individual and official capacity, FNU RUSSELL, L/T, Mr., S.T.G. GEO, L.C.F., individual and official capacity, FNU COOPER, L/T, Ms., S.T.G. GEO, L.C.F., individual capacity and others
JONES v. FEDERAL POLICE et al
as 2:2024cv01092
Plaintiff:
LOUSEVEJO JONES
Defendant:
FEDERAL POLICE, PHILADELPHIA POLICE and D.O.C. GREEN COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
