Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Crawley v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Pendleton
as 25-5258
Petitioner:
BRYAN WAYNE CRAWLEY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, PENDLETON
Real Party In Interest:
WARREN ROBERTS, SANDY WHITBREAD, DANA BAILEY and others
Douglas v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2025cv01056
Plaintiff:
Chad Douglas
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Dana Bailey, Michelle Davies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamner v. Ruth et al
as 2:2025cv00513
Plaintiff:
Mitchell C. Hamner
Defendant:
Lonnie Ruth, Dana Bailey and Kendra Pinkham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawley v. Roberts et al
as 2:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
Bryan Wayne Crawley
Defendant:
Warren Roberts, Sandy Whitbread, Dana Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. JENNINGS COUNTY et al
as 4:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
DANA BAILEY
Defendant:
JENNINGS COUNTY, JENNINGS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, ALLEN RITCHIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bailey v. KS Mgmt Services
as 21-20335
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dana Bailey
Defendant / Appellee:
KS Management Services, L.L.C.
Bailey v. KS Management Services, LLC
as 4:2020cv00059
Plaintiff:
Dana Bailey
Defendant:
KS Management Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bailey v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2016cv11704
Plaintiff:
Dana Bailey
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Guerrero et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as MOE/4:16-CV-01658
Plaintiff:
Deborah Guerrero , Cathy Burke , Rebecca Fogle and others
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Doe Manufacturers 1-100
Guerrero et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv01658
Plaintiff:
Deborah Guerrero , Cathy Burke , Rebecca Fogle and others
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Doe Manufacturers 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
