Cases 21 - 30 of 49
RANKIN et al v. HALL et al
as 2:2015cv00480
Plaintiff:
MARK RANKIN and KELLY BENNETT
Defendant:
DAVID HALL, ANDREW FEENEY and UNKNOWN SHERIFF'S OFFICERS AND/OR OFFICIALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00852
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Turner v. Beale et al
as 5:2014cv00154
Plaintiff:
David Lewis Turner
Defendant:
Crystal Sain Beale , Scott Maple , W. David Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
STRAYER et al v. DEARBORN COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 4:2012cv00098
Defendant:
DEARBORN COUNTY SHERIFF, VICTOR FAY, GUY and others
Plaintiff:
KELLEY KINGSTON STRAYER and TIMOTHY J. STRAYER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hamzik v. Office for People with Develop
as 12-2400
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John J. Hamzik
Defendant - Appellee:
Office for People with Developmental Disabilities, Broome Developmental Center, Coleen Fadden, Director of Personnel (BDC) in official capacity and in individual capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00282
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cross v. Northeastern University et al
as 1:2012cv10654
Plaintiff:
Frederick Robert Cross, Jr.
Defendant:
Northeastern University, David Hall, Daniel Givelber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
