Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv00328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Denmark v. Hofer et al
as 2:2026cv13162
Plaintiff:
David Scott Denmark
Defendant:
Nicholas Hofer, Perry Teolis, Anthony Giannola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SCOTT v. MJH LIFE SCIENCES, LLC
as 3:2026cv09534
Plaintiff:
DAVID SCOTT
Defendant:
MJH LIFE SCIENCES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Mao Ju v. Steven Hurley, et al
as 26-3689
Plaintiff:
MAO JU
Defendant:
STEVEN L. HURLEY, CYNTHINA GRUBART MARTIN, JONATHAN PAUL HEIN and others
Gafford v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2026cv00531
Plaintiff:
David Scott Gafford
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Bullock Correctional Facility, Warden Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Intellectual Reserve, et al v. Open Stories Foundation, et al
as 26-4084
Plaintiff:
INTELLECTUAL RESERVE and THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS
Counter-Claimant:
OPEN STORIES FOUNDATION and JOHN P. DEHLIN
Movant:
DAVID SCOTT TAYLOR
Rose v. Director, TDCJ - CID
as 9:2026cv00413
Petitioner:
David Scott Rose
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ - CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Wadesboro Police Department et al
as 3:2026cv00437
Plaintiff:
Lewis Nathaniel Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Wadesboro Police Department, Jason Eschert, Logan Ruocco and others
Cross-Complainant:
Kayla Wright
Cross-Defendant:
Town of Wadesboro, Ohio Casualty Insurance Company, Jason Eschert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gafford v. Butler County, Alabama Circuit Court et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2026cv00347
Plaintiff:
David Scott Gafford
Defendant:
Butler County, Alabama Circuit Court and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
