Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Pennsylvania State Conference of NAACP Branches, et al v. Northampton County Board of Elections, et al
as 23-3166
Plaintiff / Appellee: PENNSYLVANIA STATE CONFERENCE OF NAACP BRANCHES, LEAGUE OF WOMAN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA, PHILADELPHIANS ORGANIZED TO WITNESS EMPOWER AND REBUILD and others
Defendant / Appellee: NORTHAMPTON COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, SECRETARY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, ADAMS COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Not Yet Classified: RICHARD MARINO, DEMOCRATIC SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE, DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE and REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA
Appellant: STATE OF ALABAMA, BRYAN CUTLER, KIM WARD and others
Amicus Curiae: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellee: THE PROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT and SENIORLAW CENTER
North Carolina Green Party v. North Carolina State Board of Elections
as 22-1830
Plaintiff / Appellee: NORTH CAROLINA GREEN PARTY, TONY NDEGE, MATTHEW HOH and others
Defendant: NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, CHAIR DAMON CIRCOSTA, in his official capacity as a member or employee of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, STELLA ANDERSON, in her official capacity as a member or employee of the North Carolina State Board of Elections and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: DEMOCRATIC SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE and NORTH CAROLINA DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Amicus Curiae: NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE
Don Blankenship v. Fox News Network, L.L.C.
as 22-1207
Plaintiff / Appellant: DON BLANKENSHIP
Defendant / Appellee: FOX NEWS NETWORK, L.L.C., CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INCORPORATED, MSNBC, CABLE LLC and others
Defendant: HONORABLE ANDREW NAPOLITANO, (Ret.), NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE, ASSOCIATED PRESS and others
Bravo et al v. Pelosi et al
as 6:2021cv00162
Plaintiff: Jeremy Bravo, P. P., Lindsey Nguyen and others
Defendant: Mark Zuckerberg, Mike Podhorzer, Pete Sessions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Texas Democratic Party, et al v. Ruth Hughs We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-50683
Plaintiff / Appellee: Emily Gilby, Terrell Blodgett, Texas Democratic Party and others
Defendant / Appellant: Ruth Hughs, in her official capacity as the Texas Secretary of State
Texas Democratic Party, et al v. Ruth Hughs We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-50667
Plaintiff / Appellee: Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, Texas Democratic Party and Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee
Defendant / Appellant: Ruth R, Hughs
Texas Democratic Party et al v. Hughs
as 1:2019cv01063
Defendant: Ruth Hughs
Plaintiff: Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, Texas Democratic Party, Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blankenship v. Fox News Network, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00236
Defendant: Honorable Andrew Napolitano, Howie Klein, Martin Pengelly and others
Plaintiff: Don Blankenship
Petitioner: Christopher Stirewalt and Fox Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
In re Florida Ballot Order Statute Litigation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2019cv00091
Plaintiff: DSCC, DCCC, Terence Fleming and others
Defendant: Laurel M. Lee
In Re: Election Systems & Software, LLC
Intervenor Defendant: National Republican Senatorial Committee and Republican Governors Association
DEMOCRATIC SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE et al v. DETZNER et al
as 4:2018cv00528
Plaintiff: BILL NELSON FOR U S SENATE and DEMOCRATIC SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE
Defendant: RICK SCOTT, FLORIDA ELECTIONS CANVASSING COMMISSION, PAMELA BONDI and others
Intervenor: RON DESANTIS FOR GOVERNOR CAMPAIGN
Intervenor Defendant: NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?