Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Dagenhart v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Dagenhart
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
US Attorney-Social Security Noticing and SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv05028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DAGENHART v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv02650
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY A. DAGENHART
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dagenhart v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 5:2020cv00133
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dagenhart
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Nalty v. Krieger et al
as 1:2017cv02205
Plaintiff:
Stephen John Nalty
Defendant:
Marcia Smith Krieger, R. Brooke Jackson, Christine M. Arguello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dagenhart v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv01665
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dagenhart
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jonathan Dagenhart v. Jerry Goodwin, Warden
as 16-31005
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN DAGENHART
Respondent - Appellee:
JERRY GOODWIN, WARDEN, DAVID WADE CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Longview Neighbors United, LLC v. Palmetto Building Group, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00068
Plaintiff:
Longview Neighbors United, LLC
Defendant:
Palmetto Building Group, LLC , Joseph F. Strength , Roberts Civil Engineering, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dagenhart v. Goodwin
as 5:2013cv02596
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Dagenhart
Defendant:
Warden David Wade Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
