Cases 1 - 10 of 13
PERKINS v. CLARK et al
as 1:2022cv01050
Plaintiff:
DALE DOUGLAS PERKINS, JR.
Defendant:
BRAIN CLARK, R. KEEGAN SULLIVAN, MATTHEW BAILY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PERKINS v. CLARK et al
as 1:2022cv00921
Plaintiff:
DALE DOUGLAS PERKINS, JR.
Defendant:
BRAIN CLARK, R. KEEGAN SULLIVAN and MATTHEW BAILY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Douglas et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv08156
Plaintiff:
Teresa Douglas and John Dale Douglas
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Randall Douglas v. William Stephens, Director
as 16-50245
Petitioner - Appellant:
RANDALL DALE DOUGLAS
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Randall Douglas v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-50025
Petitioner - Appellant:
RANDALL DALE DOUGLAS
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Douglas v. Thaler
as 5:2012cv01201
Petitioner:
Randall Dale Douglas
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Director Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-789
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02568
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas v. Pfizer Corporation
as 2:2009cv02180
Plaintiff:
Dale Douglas
Defendant:
Pfizer Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv05908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
