Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Ballou v. Fuller et al
as 9:2012cv01595
Plaintiff:
Curtis Ray Ballou
Defendant:
Stephen Fuller, Steve Adwell, Cytha McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Robert E Deane DMD MS PA Employee Profit Sharing Plan et al
as 2:2012cv01155
Plaintiff:
Dana Smith
Defendant:
Robert E Deane DMD MS PA Employee Profit Sharing Plan and Robert E Deane
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Argot v. Harden et al
as 4:2011cv02755
Plaintiff:
Candy Argot
Defendant:
Oliver Harden, Dana Smith, Columbia Regional Care Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dohnal v. Livingston et al
as 6:2010cv00081
Petitioner:
Horacio Jose Dohnal
Respondent:
Brad Livingston, Dana Smith, Stephen Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davidson v. Desai, et al
as 1:2003cv00121
Plaintiff:
Ronald Davidson
Defendant:
Uday K. Desai , Cheng Yin , Heman Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00316
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv01992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Smith v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
as 2:2009cv13789
Plaintiff:
Dana Smith
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409 (a) Quiet Title Action
Type:
Other Statutes
Fitzpatrick v. Hall et al
as 5:2008cv00308
Plaintiff:
Dexter Fitzpatrick
Defendant:
Hilton Hall, Dana Smith, Lowgen and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
