Cases 21 - 30 of 64
Mayzlin, et al. v. Cardinal Logistics Management Corporation, et al.
as 3:2016cv02479
Defendant:
Cardinal Logistics Management Corporation
Plaintiff:
Michael Mayzlin and Michelle Dangler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Laera v. Dangler et al
as 3:2015cv00025
Plaintiff:
Vito Antonio Laera
Defendant:
Scott W. Dangler and Blanco GmbH Co. KG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dangler v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00169
Defendant:
Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Roger Dangler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER v. FRIEBOLIN et al
as 5:2014cv00836
Plaintiff:
SANDRA MILLER
Defendant:
JOSH FRIEBOLIN , ROY DANGLER , GERALD PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bennett v. State University of New York at Cortland et al
as 5:2013cv01462
Plaintiff:
Chauncey Bennett
Defendant:
State University of New York at Cortland , Police Benevolent Association of New York, Inc. and Steven Dangler
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Nonneman v. Counselor Tuley et al
as 3:2013cv00266
Defendant:
Captain Lindstrom, Counselor Tuley, Deputy Dangler and others
Plaintiff:
Kyle Gregory Nonneman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Felker et al
as 2:2012cv02719
Plaintiff:
Maurice Johnson
Defendant:
Tom Felker, Matthew Cate, Mike McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DANGLER et al v. CLOCKWORK LEARNING CENTERS et al
as 2:2012cv02683
Plaintiff:
MAREEN MISSY DANGLER and EILEEN PHILLIPS
Defendant:
CLOCKWORK LEARNING CENTERS , DAVID H. LYME , JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Dangler v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2012cv00071
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Dangler
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Robert E. O'Neill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Brown v. Felker et al
as 2:2011cv01935
Plaintiff:
Brian L. Brown
Defendant:
Tom Felker, M. Dangler, D. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
