Cases 1 - 10 of 143
Paul v. Davis et al
as 4:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Rico Paul
Defendant:
Brian Davis, Caleb Thompson, Justin Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Dutcher v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv01553
Plaintiff:
Michael Aaron Dutcher
Defendant:
Anne Precythe, Jason Lewis, Travis Terry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Oliver et al
as 1:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
Joe Daniel Adams
Defendant:
Lori Oliver, Roy Bailey, Aaron Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams et al v. Payne et al
as 1:2023cv00389
Plaintiff:
Joe Daniel Adams, Christopher Scot Taylor, David Allen Jones and others
Defendant:
James Payne, Karren Price, LeAnn Rafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Sheriff of Broward County
as 0:2023cv61586
Plaintiff:
Daniel Adams
Defendant:
Sheriff of Broward County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Tahkox-Teki Wolf-Men Clan v. US Social Security Administration et al
as 1:2023cv00274
Plaintiff:
Tahkox-Teki Wolf-Men Clan and Eric Allen
Defendant:
US Social Security Administration, Insurance Company of the Barbados, Angela Hubbard and others
Epley v. Luong
as 23-40038
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles E. Epley
Defendant / Appellee:
Hien Luong, D.D.S., Dorace L. Bedard, P.M.H.N.P., Wanda T. Hilliard, A.P.R.N. and others
GIRIMONTE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18725
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ADAM GIRIMONTE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
